> Detailanzeige

Brendlin, Andreas Stefan [VerfasserIn]; Winkelmann, Moritz [VerfasserIn]; Do, Phuong Linh [VerfasserIn]; Schwarze, Vincent [VerfasserIn]; Peisen, Felix Ludwig [VerfasserIn]; Al Mansour, Haidara [VerfasserIn]; Bongers, Malte Niklas [VerfasserIn]; Artzner, Christoph [VerfasserIn]; Weiss, Jakob [VerfasserIn]; Kim, Jong Hyo [VerfasserIn]; Othman, Ahmed [VerfasserIn]; Afat, Saif [VerfasserIn]

Simulated radiation dose reduction in whole-body CT on a 3rd generation dual-source scanner: an intraindividual comparison

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Book; Sonderdruck
  • Titel: Simulated radiation dose reduction in whole-body CT on a 3rd generation dual-source scanner: an intraindividual comparison
  • Beteiligte: Brendlin, Andreas Stefan [VerfasserIn]; Winkelmann, Moritz [VerfasserIn]; Do, Phuong Linh [VerfasserIn]; Schwarze, Vincent [VerfasserIn]; Peisen, Felix Ludwig [VerfasserIn]; Al Mansour, Haidara [VerfasserIn]; Bongers, Malte Niklas [VerfasserIn]; Artzner, Christoph [VerfasserIn]; Weiss, Jakob [VerfasserIn]; Kim, Jong Hyo [VerfasserIn]; Othman, Ahmed [VerfasserIn]; Afat, Saif [VerfasserIn]
  • Erschienen: Basel: MDPI, 2021
  • Erschienen in: Diagnostics ; 11, 1 (2021), 118
  • Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (13 Seiten); Diagramme
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010118
  • ISSN: 2075-4418
  • Identifikator:
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: Abstract: To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic confidence in contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) staging. We randomly selected March 2016 for retrospective inclusion of 18 consecutive patients (14 female, 60 ± 15 years) with clinically indicated WBCT staging on the same 3rd generation dual-source CT. Using low-dose simulations, we created data sets with 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of the original radiation dose. Each set was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE®, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) strength 1–5, resulting in 540 datasets total. ADMIRE 2 was the reference standard for intraindividual comparison. The effective radiation dose was calculated using commercially available software. For comparison of objective image quality, noise assessments of subcutaneous adipose tissue regions were performed automatically using the software. Three radiologists blinded to the study evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence independently on an equidistant 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). At 100%, the effective radiation dose in our population was 13.3 ± 9.1 mSv. At 20% radiation dose, it was possible to obtain comparably low noise levels when using ADMIRE 5 (p = 1.000, r = 0.29). We identified ADMIRE 3 at 40% radiation dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv) as the lowest achievable radiation dose with image quality and diagnostic confidence equal to our reference standard (p = 1.000, r > 0.4). The inter-rater agreement for this result was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.958, 95% CI 0.909–0.983). On a 3rd generation scanner, it is feasible to maintain good subjective image quality, diagnostic confidence, and image noise in single-energy WBCT staging at dose levels as low as 40% of the original dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv), when using ADMIRE 3
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang