Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality

Medientyp: E-Book

Titel: Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality

Beteiligte: Gurven, Michael [VerfasserIn]; Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique [VerfasserIn]; Hooper, Paul L. [VerfasserIn]; Kaplan, Hillard S. [VerfasserIn]; Quinlan, Robert [VerfasserIn]; Sear, Rebecca [VerfasserIn]; Schniter, Eric [VerfasserIn]; von Rueden, Christopher [VerfasserIn]; Bowles, Samuel [VerfasserIn]; Hertz, Tom [VerfasserIn]; Bell, Adrian [VerfasserIn]

Erschienen: [S.l.]: SSRN, 2012

Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (16 p)

Sprache: Englisch

Entstehung:

Anmerkungen: In: Current Anthropology Volume 51, Number 1, February 2010
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments 2010 erstellt

Beschreibung: We present empirical measures of wealth inequality and its intergenerational transmission among four horticulturalist populations. Wealth is construed broadly as embodied somatic and neural capital, including body size, fertility and cultural knowledge, material capital such as land and household wealth, and relational capital in the form of coalitional support and field labor. Wealth inequality is moderate for most forms of wealth, and intergenerational wealth transmission is low for material resources and moderate for embodied and relational wealth. Our analysis suggests that domestication alone does not transform social structure; rather, the presence of scarce, defensible resources may be required before inequality and wealth transmission patterns resemble the familiar pattern in more complex societies. Land ownership based on usufruct and low-intensity cultivation, especially in the context of other economic activities such as hunting and fishing, is associated with more egalitarian wealth distributions as found among hunter-gatherers

Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang

Nur in Feld suchen:

Zuletzt gesuchte Begriffe: