• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Regularization approaches in clinical biostatistics: a review of methods and their applications
  • Beteiligte: Friedrich, Sarah [VerfasserIn]; Groll, Andreas [VerfasserIn]; Ickstadt, Katja [VerfasserIn]; Kneib, Thomas [VerfasserIn]; Pauly, Markus [VerfasserIn]; Rahnenführer, Jörg [VerfasserIn]; Friede, Tim [VerfasserIn]
  • Erschienen: Augsburg University Publication Server (OPUS), 2023
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802221133557
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen: Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
  • Beschreibung: A range of regularization approaches have been proposed in the data sciences to overcome overfitting, to exploit sparsity or to improve prediction. Using a broad definition of regularization, namely controlling model complexity by adding information in order to solve ill-posed problems or to prevent overfitting, we review a range of approaches within this framework including penalization, early stopping, ensembling and model averaging. Aspects of their practical implementation are discussed including available R-packages and examples are provided. To assess the extent to which these approaches are used in medicine, we conducted a review of three general medical journals. It revealed that regularization approaches are rarely applied in practical clinical applications, with the exception of random effects models. Hence, we suggest a more frequent use of regularization approaches in medical research. In situations where also other approaches work well, the only downside of the regularization approaches is increased complexity in the conduct of the analyses which can pose challenges in terms of computational resources and expertise on the side of the data analyst. In our view, both can and should be overcome by investments in appropriate computing facilities and educational resources.
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang