• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: 0730 Validation studies for scoring polysomnograms and home sleep apnea tests with artificial intelligence: Sleep stage probabilities (hypnodensity) derived from neurological or cardiorespiratory signals
  • Beteiligte: Anderer, Peter; Ross, Marco; Cerny, Andreas; Fonseca, Pedro; Shaw, Edmund; Bakker, Jessie
  • Erschienen: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022
  • Erschienen in: Sleep
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac079.726
  • ISSN: 0161-8105; 1550-9109
  • Schlagwörter: Physiology (medical) ; Neurology (clinical)
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>There have been significant advances in machine learning in recent years. This means that powerful methods are now available for classification problems, such as scoring sleep stages from neurological or cardiorespiratory signals. In the present work, validation studies for both applications are presented.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>To determine the 5 sleep stages from the neurological signals, 54 sleep-wake-related features were calculated and classified by a bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) network which had been trained on 1956 manual scorings of 588 PSGs from 294 subjects (supervised deep learning). To determine the 4 stages (wake, light sleep, deep sleep, REM) from cardiorespiratory signals, a convolutional neural network combined with LSTM layers was used for feature extraction and classification. This network had been trained on 685 PSGs from 391 subjects (Bakker et al. JCSM 2021). The networks obtained were validated in 428 PSGs with one and 10 PSGs with 12 manual scorings (neurological staging) as well as in 2 two datasets, each containing 296 ambulatory recordings (cardiorespiratory staging).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Cohen’s kappa between autoscoring based on neurological signals and manual scoring was 0.74 (95%-confidence interval: 0.74-0.74) for the 428 PSGs. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement between autoscoring and manual scoring was for the AHI 0.97 (0.96-0.98), for the arousal index 0.79 (0.67-0.86) and for the PLMSI 0.91 (0.88-0.93). The ICC between the sleep stage probabilities derived from the 12 manual scorings and the artificial intelligence (AI) derived hypnodensity was 0.91 (0.91-0.91). Cohen’s kappa values for the cardiorespiratory sleep staging were 0.68 (0.68-0.68) and 0.64 (0.63-0.64) for the 2 datasets with 296 ambulatory recordings each.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>All metrics from the PSG validation studies show substantial (Cohen’s kappa &amp;gt; 0.6) as well as good to excellent agreement (ICC &amp;gt; 0.75 or &amp;gt; 0.90) compared to manual scorings. As an added value of the AI-supported PSG evaluation, the probabilities of the sleep stages per epoch are determined (hypnodensity graph). The valid estimation of the sleep stages from cardiorespiratory signals by means of AI may result in improved clinical interpretation of home sleep apnea tests, which are increasingly used in the sleep-disordered breathing diagnostic pathway.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Support (If Any)</jats:title> <jats:p> </jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang