• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: IDH1 Mutations as Molecular Signature and Predictive Factor of Secondary Glioblastomas
  • Beteiligte: Nobusawa, Sumihito; Watanabe, Takuya; Kleihues, Paul; Ohgaki, Hiroko
  • Erschienen: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2009
  • Erschienen in: Clinical Cancer Research
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0715
  • ISSN: 1078-0432; 1557-3265
  • Schlagwörter: Cancer Research ; Oncology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Purpose: To establish the frequency of IDH1 mutations in glioblastomas at a population level, and to assess whether they allow reliable discrimination between primary (de novo) glioblastomas and secondary glioblastomas that progressed from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma.</jats:p> <jats:p>Experimental Design: We screened glioblastomas from a population-based study for IDH1 mutations and correlated them with clinical data and other genetic alterations.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results: IDH1 mutations were detected in 36 of 407 glioblastomas (8.8%). Glioblastoma patients with IDH1 mutations were younger (mean, 47.9 years) than those with EGFR amplification (60.9 years) and were associated with significantly longer survival (mean, 27.1 versus 11.3 months; P &amp;lt; 0.0001). IDH1 mutations were frequent in glioblastomas diagnosed as secondary (22 of 30; 73%), but rare in primary glioblastomas (14 of 377; 3.7%: P &amp;lt; 0.0001). IDH1 mutations as genetic marker of secondary glioblastoma corresponded to the respective clinical diagnosis in 95% of cases. Glioblastomas with IDH1 mutation diagnosed as primary had clinical and genetic profiles similar to those of secondary glioblastomas, suggesting that they may have rapidly progressed from a less malignant precursor lesion that escaped clinical diagnosis and were thus misclassified as primary. Conversely, glioblastomas without IDH1 mutations clinically diagnosed as secondary typically developed from anaplastic rather than low-grade gliomas, suggesting that at least some were actually primary glioblastomas, that may have been misclassified, possibly due to histologic sampling error.</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusion: IDH1 mutations are a strong predictor of a more favorable prognosis and a highly selective molecular marker of secondary glioblastomas that complements clinical criteria for distinguishing them from primary glioblastomas. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(19):6002–7)</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang