• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey
  • Beteiligte: Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja; Braun, Tobias; Bahns, Carolin; Happe, Lisa; Kopkow, Christian
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022
  • Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z
  • ISSN: 1472-6963
  • Schlagwörter: Health Policy
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in clinical practice.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>A nationwide online survey was performed among healthcare professionals in Germany from January to April 2018 using the German version of the Evidence-based Practice Inventory (EBPI) questionnaire for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between demographic and professional determinants and each EBPI dimension.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>We analysed data of 889 participants, including 318 physical therapists, 154 occupational therapists, 137 midwifes and 280 participants of six other healthcare professions. Approximately 70% of the participants generally demonstrated a positive attitude towards EBP and believed that EBP was useful in clinical practice. Broadly, 80% of the respondents evaluated themselves as being able to enact EBP behaviour in clinical practice. In contrast, less than 70% preferred to use quantitative information instead of their intuition to inform their habitual clinical behaviour. Still, 20 to 30% reported that EBP did not sufficiently account for their clinical experience and differences between patients.</jats:p> <jats:p>The strongest facilitators to EBP adherence across at least three dimensions of the EBPI were the availability of ≥ 60 min for scientific literature at work (OR: 9.67; 95% CI: 5.86; 16.30), followed by a master or higher academic degree (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.86; 14.28) and the involvement in ≥ 1 scientific publication (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 5.10; 9.85).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>This study showed that healthcare professionals in Germany in general had a positive attitude towards EBP although they currently do not consider EBP principles in its entirety. The most important determinant positively influencing a healthcare professional’s decision to perform EBP was the time available for scientific literature at work. German healthcare professionals experience similar barriers towards the implementation of EBP in clinical practice compared to other international healthcare settings. These barriers should be targeted by future research.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title> <jats:p>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013792). Registered 19 January 2018.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang