• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Agroforestry-based community forestry as a large-scale strategy to reforest agricultural encroachment areas in Myanmar: ambition vs. local reality
  • Beteiligte: San, Su Mon; Kumar, Navneet; Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa; Schmitt, Christine B.
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023
  • Erschienen in: Annals of Forest Science
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13595-023-01191-x
  • ISSN: 1297-966X
  • Schlagwörter: Ecology ; Forestry
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Key message</jats:title> <jats:p>The Forest Department strongly influences agroforestry design, tree species selection, and the participation and motivation of farmers to plant trees. Farmers perceive trees as harmful to crops and have avoided planting them near crops. We recommend considering farmers’ preferences, establishing farmers’ field schools, and increasing their awareness about the benefits of trees to improve adoption rates of agroforestry systems.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Context</jats:title> <jats:p>The high rate of deforestation in Myanmar is mainly due to agricultural expansion. One task of the Forest Department is to increase tree cover in the agricultural encroachment areas by establishing large-scale agroforestry-based community forests (ACFs).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Aim</jats:title> <jats:p>The objectives of this study were to analyze the adoption and performance of the ACFs in the agricultural encroachment areas in the Bago-Yoma Region, Myanmar; and to provide recommendations to enhance the adoption of ACFs by farmers.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We inventoried 42 sample plots and surveyed 291 farmers. Survey responses were analyzed by binary logistic regression, one-way ANOVA, and non-parametric correlation tests to evaluate factors influencing the adoption of ACFs. Stand characteristics were calculated from the inventory data to evaluate the performance of ACFs.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Our results show that farmer participation in ACFs was lower than stated in the registry of the Forest Department. Farmers practiced four different agroforestry designs in ACFs with different outcomes. The Forest Department strongly determined tree species and planting designs, farmers’ perception and participation in ACFs. Farmland size, unclear, and insufficient information on ACFs, and a negative perception of raising trees in crop fields were the major factors limiting the adoption rates of ACFs.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>We recommend capacity building for farmers and Forest Department staff and raising awareness about the benefits of planting designs and trees on farmland. A stronger consideration of farmers’ preferences for design and species selection could increase their motivation to adopt ACFs and improve the long-term sustainability of ACFs.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang