Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Questions</jats:title><jats:p>How and to what extent do environmental filtering and dispersal limitation affect species turnover among sites in the temperate deciduous broad‐leaved forests of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>hina? Do different life forms respond to environmental filtering and dispersal limitation in the same way?</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Location</jats:title><jats:p>Seventeen mountains (31°8′–44°22′N, to 104°42′–128°8′E) in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>hina.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We measured the plant species composition of 495 plots. We calculated the Jaccard's similarity (<jats:italic>S</jats:italic><jats:sub>Jac</jats:sub>) of species composition, geographic distance (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>g</jats:sub>) and environmental divergence (<jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>e</jats:sub>) for each plot pair for trees, shrubs and herbs. Three plot pair groups were distinguished: (1) plot pairs with both plots from the same mountain; (2) plot pairs with two plots from different mountains but with a similar environment; (3) plot pairs with two plots from different mountains and with a heterogeneous environment. We analysed the relationship between <jats:italic>S</jats:italic><jats:sub>Jac</jats:sub>, <jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>g</jats:sub> and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>e</jats:sub> for all three groups, and performed partial redundancy analysis. We also calculated beta‐diversity of mountains, and explored latitudinal and climatic patterns of beta‐diversity.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p><jats:italic>S</jats:italic><jats:sub>Jac</jats:sub> decreases significantly with both <jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>e</jats:sub> and <jats:italic>D</jats:italic><jats:sub>g</jats:sub> for all three plot pair groups. Environmental and geographic variables together explain 13.8%, 11.6% and 11.1% of variance in species composition of trees, shrubs and herbs, respectively. For all life forms, environment explains more variance than geography, and environment and geography have strong co‐varying effects. The beta‐diversity for each mountain decreases with latitude, but increases with mean annual temperature (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAT</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Environmental filtering rather than dispersal limitation predominantly regulates patterns of species turnover in the temperate deciduous broad‐leaved forests of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>hina. Furthermore, the increases of beta‐diversity along <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAT</jats:styled-content> also support the effects of environment on species turnover. These results indicate that environment might influence the distribution of most species in temperate forests of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>hina. However, dispersal limitation still independently accounts for a small amount of variance in species turnover. We therefore conclude that environmental filtering and dispersal limitation have both combined and independent effects, but environmental filtering is more important in shaping the community assembly of temperate deciduous broad‐leaved forests of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>hina.</jats:p></jats:sec>