• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: On what do therapists agree? Assessing therapist evaluations of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness
  • Beteiligte: Southward, Matthew W.; Wilson, Anne C.; Cheavens, Jennifer S.
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 2021
  • Erschienen in: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1111/papt.12302
  • ISSN: 2044-8341; 1476-0835
  • Schlagwörter: Psychiatry and Mental health ; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ; Clinical Psychology ; Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To develop more unified, process‐based, and disseminable psychotherapy treatments, it is important to determine whether there is consensus among therapists regarding intervention strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Because emotion regulation is a cornerstone of modern treatments and a thriving area of clinical research, we assessed therapists’ ratings of the effectiveness of commonly studied emotion regulation strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Therapists (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 582) read eleven vignettes describing stressful scenarios and rated the effectiveness of ten emotion regulation strategies in each scenario.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Across therapists, we found general consensus regarding the most (i.e., problem‐solving) and least (i.e., concealing emotions) effective strategies. Cognitive/behavioural/third‐wave therapists rated acceptance and distraction as more effective, and emotional expression and gathering information as less effective, than other therapists, <jats:italic>F</jats:italic>s&gt; 4.20, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>s &lt; .05, whereas hours of clinical experience were generally unrelated to strategy effectiveness ratings.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>We discuss what these points of agreement and relative disagreement among therapists reveal about a more unified, process‐based treatment approach and how these results can guide emotion regulation research.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Practitioner points</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>There is general consensus among practising therapists that problem‐solving is the most effective emotion regulation strategy and expressive suppression is the least effective.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>However, CBT‐oriented therapists rated acceptance and distraction as more effective than non‐CBT‐oriented therapists.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Non‐CBT‐oriented therapists rated emotional expression and gathering information as more effective than CBT‐oriented therapists.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Years of experience were unrelated to ratings of emotion regulation strategy effectiveness.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p></jats:sec>