• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Impact of multidisciplinary therapy on high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA)
  • Beteiligte: Beaty, Karen A.; Royal, Richard E.; Fournier, Keith F.; Taggart, Melissa W.; Overman, Michael J.; Phillips, Jonathan; Rafeeq, Safia; Mansfield, Paul F.; Wolff, Robert A.; Eng, Cathy
  • Erschienen: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2013
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4134
  • ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
  • Schlagwörter: Cancer Research ; Oncology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p> 4134 </jats:p><jats:p> Background: AA is a rare malignancy ranging from well-differentiated to poorly differentiated carcinoma, including those with signet ring cells. Optimal therapy for low grade peritoneal disease is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, some patients (pts) are suboptimal for CRS/HIPEC, and are considered for systemic chemotherapy (SC) alone, or SC + CRS. In light of our previously reported overall survival (OS) benefits for the role of SC in metastatic AA, here we explore the impact of surgical intervention on OS in these pts. Our aim was to clarify the OS benefit of multidisciplinary therapy (SC + CRS + HIPEC) in those pts with aggressive tumor biology. Methods: A retrospective chart review of AA pts registered in our tumor registry between Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2009 was undertaken to identify patients with AA who received SC. Electronic medical records (EMR) were reviewed for CRS, HIPEC, histology, SC, and OS. The K-M method and Log-Rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Of 143 AA pts, 52 (36%) pts were high grade with 33 (23%) having signet ring cells. After a median follow-up of 35M, high grade tumors were noted to have worse OS overall (24M vs 56M, p&lt;.001). When comparing treatment received, and adjusting for tumor biology, those pts with high grade disease again fared worse, and experienced comparatively worse OS. However, those treated with SC + CRS + HIPEC experienced the longest median survival. Conclusions: Pts with peritoneal disease from high grade AA who completed SC with CRS + HIPEC experienced prolonged OS compared to those treated by SC +/- CRS. Our data suggest that SC + palliative CRS offers minimal benefit for high grade disease. Selection bias influences these results heavily; as those who do well proceed to complete all components of therapy. A treatment plan that includes SC + CRS + HIPEC can result in durable survival, and is a strategy that warrants further study emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary management. [Table: see text] </jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang