• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Efficacy of an Education Program for People With Diabetes and Insulin Pump Treatment (INPUT): Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Beteiligte: Ehrmann, Dominic; Kulzer, Bernhard; Schipfer, Melanie; Lippmann-Grob, Bernhard; Haak, Thomas; Hermanns, Norbert
  • Erschienen: American Diabetes Association, 2018
  • Erschienen in: Diabetes Care
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0917
  • ISSN: 0149-5992; 1935-5548
  • Schlagwörter: Advanced and Specialized Nursing ; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ; Internal Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title> <jats:p>Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is the most advanced form of insulin delivery, but it requires structured education to provide users with the necessary knowledge/skills and to support their motivation. Currently, no structured education program designed to provide this training has been evaluated. We developed a CSII-specific, structured education program (Insulin Pump Treatment [INPUT]) and evaluated its impact on glycemic control, behavior, and psychosocial status.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS</jats:title> <jats:p>This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel trial with a 6-month follow-up. Eligible participants (age 16–75 years) currently were treated with insulin pump therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the INPUT program or to usual care using a computer-generated algorithm, with study center as the stratification factor. The primary outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and changes in behavioral and psychosocial measures.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>Between 1 April 2016 and 26 April 2016, 268 people with diabetes and a mean duration of CSII therapy of 9.5 years were randomly assigned to the INPUT group (n = 135) or control group (n = 133). At 6 months, HbA1c improved in the INPUT group (8.33 ± 0.8 vs. 8.04 ± 0.9; P &amp;lt; 0.0001) but not in the control group (8.33 ± 1.0 vs. 8.27 ± 1.0; P = 0.11). The between-group difference in HbA1c reduction was significant, favoring INPUT (−0.28% vs. −0.06%, Δ −0.22%, 95% CI −0.38 to −0.06; P = 0.0029). The incidence rate ratio of severe hypoglycemia was 3.55 times higher for participants in the control group than for those in the INPUT group (95% CI 1.50–8.43; P = 0.0041).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>The INPUT education program led to a significant improvement in glycemic control and incidence of severe hypoglycemia in insulin pump users.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang