Beschreibung:
<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction:</jats:title><jats:p> The purpose of this study was to establish reliability of the Role Checklist Version 2: Quality of Performance (Role Checklist V2: QP) and verify the internal consistency between paper and electronic administration. This revised Role Checklist includes a Part 3, which prompts clients to rank the quality of their current performance in occupational roles, thus adding an ‘insider view’, to complete the picture of clients' occupational role participation. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method:</jats:title><jats:p> One hundred participants completed the Role Checklist V2: QP by paper and electronic means in a test—retest design. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Findings:</jats:title><jats:p> Estimates of kappa, weighted kappa, and Cronbach's alpha were used to measure the reliability of the Role Checklist V2: QP. For Part 1, kappa values for individual roles ranged from 0.53 to 0.95. Cronbach's alpha values representing percent agreement for Parts 2 and 3 showed a significant level of agreement between paper and electronic administrations. Values for Part 2 and 3 showed almost perfect agreement of 0.88 to 1.0. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> Kappa and Cronbach's alpha values indicate the Role Checklist V2: QP is a reliable instrument and can be administered confidently via either electronic means or paper and pencil to gather information about clients' role incumbency, role value, and satisfaction with role performance. </jats:p></jats:sec>