> Detailanzeige

Fassnacht, Karin S.; Gower, Stith T.

Comparison of the Litterfall and Forest Floor Organic Matter and Nitrogen Dynamics of Upland Forest Ecosystems in North Central Wisconsin

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Comparison of the Litterfall and Forest Floor Organic Matter and Nitrogen Dynamics of Upland Forest Ecosystems in North Central Wisconsin
  • Beteiligte: Fassnacht, Karin S.; Gower, Stith T.
  • Erschienen: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999
  • Erschienen in: Biogeochemistry
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISSN: 0168-2563; 1573-515X
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <p>It has been suggested that a feedback exists between the vegetation and soil whereby fertile (vs infertile) sites support species with shorter leaf life spans and higher quality litter which promotes rapid decomposition and higher soil nutrient availability. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize and compare the C and N dynamics of dominant upland forest ecosystems in north central Wisconsin, (2) compare the nutrient use efficiency (NUE) of these forests, and (3) examine the relationship between NUE and site characteristics. Analyzing data from 24 stands spanning a moisture / nutrient gradient, we found that resource-poor stands transferred less C and N from the vegetation to the forest floor, and that N remained in the forest floor at least four times longer than in more resource-rich stands. Analyzing data by leaf habit, we found that less N was transferred to the forest floor annually via litterfall in conifer stands, and that N remained in the forest floor of these stands nearly three times longer than in hardwood stands. NUE did not differ among forests with different resource availabilities, but was greater for conifers than for hardwoods. Vitousek's (1982) index of nutrient use efficiency (I&lt;sub&gt;NUE1&lt;/sub&gt; = leaf litterfall biomass / leaf litterfall N) was most closely correlated to litterfall specific leaf area and percent hardwood leaf area index, suggesting that differences in species composition may have been responsible for the differences in NUE among our stands. NUE2, defined as ANPP / leaf litterfall N, was not closely correlated to any of the site characteristics included in this analysis.</p>