> Details

Messer, Ben; Tedd, Hilary; Doris, Tom; Mountain, Andrew; Gatilogo, Cris; Sovani, Milind

The variation of FiO2 with circuit type and peak inspiratory flow rate during non-invasive respiratory support using domiciliary ventilators and its significance during the COVID-19 pandemic

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: The variation of FiO2 with circuit type and peak inspiratory flow rate during non-invasive respiratory support using domiciliary ventilators and its significance during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Contributor: Messer, Ben; Tedd, Hilary; Doris, Tom; Mountain, Andrew; Gatilogo, Cris; Sovani, Milind
  • imprint: SAGE Publications, 2022
  • Published in: Journal of the Intensive Care Society
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1177/1751143720980280
  • ISSN: 1751-1437
  • Keywords: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ; Critical Care Nursing
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in increased admissions with respiratory failure and there have been reports of oxygen failure and shortages of machines to deliver ventilation and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). Domiciliary ventilators which entrain room air have been widely used during the pandemic. Poor outcomes reported with non-invasive respiratory support using ventilators which lack an oxygen blender could be related to an unreliable Fraction of inspired O<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>). Additionally, with concerns about oxygen failure, the variety of ventilator circuits used as well as differing peak inspiratory flow rates (PIFR) could impact on the FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> delivered during therapy with domiciliary ventilators. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> In a series of bench tests, we tested the effect of choice of circuit and different PIFR on the FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> achieved during simulation of ventilation and CPAP therapy using domiciliary ventilators. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> was highly dependent upon the type of circuit used with circuits with an active exhalation valve achieving similar FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> at lower oxygen flow rates than circuits using an exhalation port. During CPAP therapy, high PIFR resulted in significantly lower FiO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> than low PIFR. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> This study has implications for oxygen usage as well as delivery of non-invasive respiratory support during therapy with domiciliary ventilators when these are used during the second wave of COVID-19. </jats:p></jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access