• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Qualitative comparison of non-destructive methods for inspection of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates
  • Beteiligte: Rus, Janez; Gustschin, Alex; Mooshofer, Hubert; Grager, Jan-Carl; Bente, Klaas; Gaal, Mate; Pfeiffer, Franz; Grosse, Christian U.
  • Erschienen: SAGE Publications, 2020
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Composite Materials
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1177/0021998320931162
  • ISSN: 0021-9983; 1530-793X
  • Schlagwörter: Materials Chemistry ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechanics of Materials ; Ceramics and Composites
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p> In the rapidly expanding composite industry, novel inspection methods have been developed in recent years. Particularly promising for air-coupled testing are cellular polypropylene transducers which offer better impedance matching to air than piezoelectric transducers. Furthermore, broadband transmitters (laser-induced ultrasound and thermoacoustic emitters) and receivers (optical microphones) have opened a completely new chapter for advanced contact-free ultrasound inspection. X-ray dark-field radiography offers a different approach to detect porosity and microcracks, employing small angle X-ray scattering. These innovative ultrasonic and radiographic alternatives were evaluated in comparison with well-established inspection techniques. We applied thirteen different non-destructive methods to inspect the same specimen (a carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminate with induced impact damage): air-coupled ultrasound testing (using piezoelectric transducers, broadband optical microphones, cellular polypropylene transducers, and a thermoacoustic emitter), laser-induced ultrasound testing, ultrasonic immersion testing, phased array ultrasonic testing, optically excited lock-in thermography, and X-ray radiography (projectional absorption and dark-field, tomosynthesis, and micro-computed tomography). The inspection methods were qualitatively characterized by comparing the scan results. The conclusions are advantageous for a decision on the optimal method for certain testing constraints. </jats:p>